A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

On February 1, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Labor Standards Act in the Suwon District Court’s Eunpyeong Housing Site, and the execution of the sentence was completed at the Suwon House on May 23, 2013.

1. On December 23, 2014, the Defendant issued a letter of delegation on the application for overdue wages, etc. from “new consulting office for labor law firm” in 303,301, e.g., the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and the Ministry of Labor, which was 2166, to the said labor law firm, issued a letter of delegation on the application for overdue wages, etc. from “B” to the effect that the Defendant did not receive wages from “B” and had the said labor law firm submit the said letter of overdue payment to C, who was registered as the representative of B at the branch office of the Gyeonggi-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, the Ministry of Labor, which was 2166.

On March 19, 2015, the Defendant appeared at the 3rd office of the sports branch office of the above Ministry of Labor and made a supplementary statement to the effect that he did not receive wages of 5.7 million won from “B” C, the representative of the Ministry of Labor.

However, in fact, the Defendant, along with the above C, was aware that he was unable to file a claim for wage under the premise that he was a worker with C, and was aware that the Defendant had been unable to file a claim against C for wage under the premise that he was a worker, thereby hiding the business operation of the above “B” with the intent to receive a substitute payment for a small amount of amount of money, and filing the said petition against C with C.

As a result, the defendant reported false facts to the Ministry of Labor for the purpose of having C receive criminal punishment.

2. On May 12, 2015, the Defendant submitted a written application for a small amount of substitute payment to the effect that he/she would not receive a wage of KRW 5.7 million from “B” to a branch of the Victim’s Labor Welfare Service, and that he/she would pay a small amount of substitute payment.

However, in fact, the Defendant was not a worker of “B” as stated in paragraph 1, and thus, the Defendant was not entitled to receive a substitute payment for small amount.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.