1. As to the Plaintiff, the Defendant: (a) with respect to the 1,344 square meters in Namyang-si, Namyang-si; and (b) on June 25, 1998, the Kuyang-si District Court registry office.

1. The recognition (1) Plaintiff and D (the Plaintiff’s spouse was divorced on January 15, 2014)’s factory head F of E (the Plaintiff’s spouse was divorced) suffered occupational accidents.

(2) Although D does not have a debt with a view to evading compulsory execution from F, it is possible to conclude the registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage with the Defendant, the debtor, and the maximum debt amount as KRW 60,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

(3) D completed the registration of ownership transfer of the instant land on the ground of donation on December 5, 2000.

(4) The F completed the provisional attachment execution on June 12, 2003 with respect to the land of this case owned by the Plaintiff, and there is a defect in seeking to enforce enforcement with the enforcement title (this Court Order 2003DaDa32582 decided to recommend reconciliation), and the Plaintiff completed the registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage with respect to the land of this case, although there is no debt for the purpose of evading compulsory execution from F, the Plaintiff did not have a debt for the purpose of evading compulsory execution from F. The mortgagee No. 86286, Sept. 2, 2003, who received on September 2, 2003, the Nam-gu District Court

[Grounds for recognition] Gap 1-5's entries and the purport of the whole argument

2. Determination of the right to collateral security is a mortgage established by setting only the maximum amount of the debt to be secured and reserving the determination of an obligation in the future (Article 357(1) of the Civil Act). Since multiple and unspecified claims arising from continuous transactions are established for the purpose of securing a certain limit in a settlement term in the future, there is a legal act establishing a secured claim of the right to collateral security, separate from the act of establishing the right to collateral security, and the burden of proving whether there was a legal act establishing the secured claim of the right to collateral security at the time the right to collateral

(See Supreme Court Decision 2009Da72070 decided Dec. 24, 2009). Gamblocks, the Defendant, and the Defendant.