logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.10.16 2019가단9518
채무부존재확인
Text

1. On April 3, 2019, between the Defendants and the E-si vehicles of D Driving, the G Pharmacy located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F is front of the said G-si around 11:50.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a corporation that is engaged in passenger transport business, etc. as the owner of the E-si vehicle of D driving, and Defendant B is the driver of H vehicle, and Defendant C is the spouse of Defendant B.

B. Around 11:50 on April 3, 2019, the developments leading up to the occurrence of a traffic accident D: (a) driven by the E-si vehicle owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and changed the front road of the G pharmacy located in the Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F into one lane due to the negligence of neglecting the left-hand speed from the direction of the new intersection to the right-side distance, among the two lanes, while driving along the two lanes, and (b) conflict with the H vehicle driven by the Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) with the front wheeler part of the Plaintiff vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

(1) The Defendants were injured by each of the two weeks’ medical care due to the instant accidents, including the payment of medical expenses, etc. by the Financial Cooperative. The Defendants paid Defendant B, from April 4, 2019 to May 30, 2019; Defendant C, from April 4, 2019 to May 24, 2019 to 19; and Defendant C, from J oriental Medical Hospital, to 24, 2019 to 305, 405, and 90, respectively, to Defendant C, at the request of the Defendants, as mutual aid business operators of Plaintiff C’s vehicle, at the request of the Defendants.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1 through 5, Eul's 1 through 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendants cannot be deemed to have suffered injury due to the instant accident, and thus, the Defendants did not bear liability for damages, and the Defendants asserted that they sustained injury due to the instant accident.

B. The occurrence of liability for damages 1.

arrow