1. As to Plaintiff A’s KRW 624,015,276, Plaintiff B, Plaintiff C, and Plaintiff D, respectively, and each of the said money.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition (1) on June 11, 2013, E driven a F-Apurt Transported Automobile (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) on a 18:10-on June 11, 2013, and turn to the left as one-lane of the front door of the apartment unit between 22 and 23 vehicles located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G apartment, and without temporarily stopping the above crosswalk while the Plaintiff A and D are passing the above crosswalk, they did not temporarily stop and turn to the left without looking at the front door, and thereby, they suffered injury, such as blood transfusion, light-roping blood, two ducts, and brakes, etc., by shocking the Plaintiff A, who was crossing the crosswalk to the left left from the right side of the Defendant vehicle driving direction, and suffered injury by the Plaintiff, such as flading the flab, fladingly, flading, fladinginginging the two du

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (2) Plaintiff B is the husband of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C and D are the children of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant vehicle.

【Ground for Recognition: Unsatisfy, Gap 1 through 9 (if there is a tentative number, including a branch number; hereinafter the same shall apply)

(2) The grounds of appeal No. 1

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case.

C. However, according to the evidence above, the defendant's liability is limited by taking into account the following as a whole: (a) the plaintiff's error of crossing the above road without properly examining the progress of the vehicle; and (b) such error is deemed to have caused the occurrence of the accident in this case and the expansion of damages; (c) the defendant's liability is limited in consideration of the error by the plaintiff A; (d) the crosswalk, which is the place where the accident occurred, was installed in the apartment complex; (e) there is no reason to obstruct the driver's view at the time of the accident; and (e) there is no reason to obstruct the driver's view at the time of the accident, and therefore

2. The scope of the liability shall be below.