beta
Text
Defendant
A Co., Ltd. shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.
Defendant
B above.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Basic Relations] Defendant A corporation is a corporation established for the purpose of building construction business in Seo-gu Incheon E and 205, and Defendant B is a general manager in charge of safety management of interest of the site site collection of “(State) production factory extension work” performed by Defendant A corporation.
[Criminal facts]
1. Defendant B
A. As a result of neglecting the risk of collapse, Defendant A Co., Ltd. violated the Industrial Safety and Health Act due to his occupational injury and injury, and Defendant A Co., Ltd., on May 13, 2015, the part of the F-production factory extension work in Chungcheongbuk-gun G was contracted and executed on May 13, 2015.
Defendant B, a general manager of safety management, calculated the value of the expected load due to the work, and confirmed whether the strength of the parts supporting the ceiling is consistent with it, and there is a risk of collapse of the ceiling, since parts supporting the ceiling may collapse at any time when they are unable to check the load of workers.
In the case of judgment, there was a duty of care to prevent collapse accidents, such as taking measures to prohibit access to a tent.
In addition, if there is a risk of collapse, etc. due to the weight, snow pressure or other added load, etc. on behalf of the business owner, Defendant B should perform safety evaluation on behalf of the business owner, and remove the risk of collapse, etc. to workers in advance.
Nevertheless, Defendant B, without confirming the diameter of the C-type C-based strong discharge, which is a main component supporting the ceiling, installed in a tent with a low diameter of the diameter of the discharge, and even though employees reported on the “defluence” to the “defluence,” Defendant B did not take measures to ensure safety by establishing separate safety measures for it, etc., and instead ordered employees to extend the 3-story label warehouse by negligence, which led employees to extend the 3-story warehouse.