A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 3, 2019, at around 02:50, the Defendant interfered with the business, at the main point of “D” operated by the victim C in the third floor of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City B building, the Defendant lying the city expenses to the said victim while setting up an electric temperature engine located in the said location, putting it up on the floor by gathering an electric heat engine at the said location, and putting the waste bage and cooling breath off the front of the customers, and interfered with the said victim’s business operation by force for about 30 minutes.

2. The Defendant: (a) destroyed the property damage, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1. at the same time and place, that caused the damage to KRW 300,00,000 by gathering electric temperature equipment, which is the victim C, in which the victim C was able to wear the string, leaving the string part of the string, leaving the string part, walking the string part, walking the string part, walking the string part, walking the string part with the string part, making the string part of the string part of the string part, and making the string part of the string part of the string part, which is the victim’s possession.

3. On November 3, 2019, the Defendant: (a) arrested in the act of interference with business, etc. on the part of the Defendant committed the crime of interference with business; (b) arrived at the F District of the Seoul Nowon-gu Seoul Nowon-gu Police Station located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu; and (c) assaulted the police officers working in the place of the crime of spiting spiting and spiting down the spit; and (d) flading the spit of the spit G G’s reflaf that the Defendant attempted to restrain

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the maintenance of order in the National Police Agency.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the first protocol of trial;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement concerning G and C;

1. A H statement;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as photographs on the scene of damage, investigation reports (fence CCTV images of police officers), and opinions;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with business), Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;