The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. As to the summary of the grounds for appeal No. 2013 high-level 1312, the defendant borrowed 4 million won from the village transfer team and the Development Committee in order to purchase materials necessary for replacing the village water pipelines, and actually purchased the materials after obtaining prior approval from the victim C (hereinafter "victim"), and there was no fact that the victim acquired 4 million won from the victim by deceiving that he would pay the materials on credit as stated in the judgment of the court below. As to subparagraph 2013 high-level 1492, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts of all of the charges of this case, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court and the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the trial court as to 2013 Go-Ma1312, the Defendant can sufficiently recognize the fact that the Defendant acquired 4 million won from the victim as stated in the lower judgment, as stated in the judgment, and each testimony of the witness K and L is insufficient evidence to have probative value, and thus, this part of the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

① A victim had provided water pipes from a creative city with respect to the construction work of replacing water pipes for living in a village constructed in February 2012 from an investigative agency to the lower court’s court’s court. However, the Defendant concealed it, and the Defendant had purchased materials such as water pipes on credit from the relevant enterprise, thereby changing the amount of KRW 4 million to the credit payment.