Text
1. On July 24, 2015, concluded between the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and B on the corporeal movables listed in the separate sheet.
Reasons
1. On May 1, 2014, the Defendant entered into a contract with D (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) on the supply of goods, such as a multi-purpose lecture board, gold bar board, etc. On the same day, E, the representative director of the Nonparty Company, entered into a joint and several guarantee contract with Nonparty Company on the same day.
Since then, the Defendant: (a) incurred a claim for the payment of goods in KRW 424,729,729,00,000,000,000 for KRW 140,663,292 for May 21, 2014; (b) and KRW 151,785,843 for June; and (c) KRW 132,280,104 for July; (b) Nonparty Company paid KRW 100,63,292 for May; and (c) Nonparty Company was unable to pay the remainder KRW 324,065,947 for the principal of the remaining obligation on November 21, 2014, plus interest KRW 17,61,727,072 for KRW 341,727,019 for the Defendant by December 31, 2014.
B-ASEAN, C is the spouse of B, and C was the spouse of B on December 5, 2014, and B, on December 10, 2014, each of the non-party companies and the Defendant jointly and severally performed all obligations arising between B and the Defendant.
The defendant, E, C, and B (the payment order is indicated as F, but the F of the payment order is judged to be a clerical error in B when considering the certificate of personal seal impression and resident registration number etc.) requested the purchase of goods against the Daegu District Court in the payment order case No. 2015j64, Feb. 13, 2015, the Daegu District Court Dalgu District Court 2015, E, C, and B were jointly and severally liable to the defendant for 341,727,019 won and 8% per annum from January 1, 2015 to the delivery date of the payment order and 20% per annum from the next day to the date of complete payment, and this order was finalized on March 14, 2015.
The instant movable is owned by B, and on July 24, 2015, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant, hereinafter “Plaintiff”) drafted a notarial deed of loan for consumption of money by means of transfer, No. 374, No. 374, No. 2015, which was issued by a notary public, on the instant movable and the instant movable.
The defendant shall have the executive force of 2015j.64 of the Daegu District Court of Law No. 2015, Mar. 2, 2014.