The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (2 million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the judgment of the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). The fact that the Defendant’s unpaid wages and retirement allowances are not considerable is that the Defendant is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant recognized the case of this case and is against the defendant, and the fact that there is no past record of criminal punishment for about 20 years is favorable to the defendant.

In full view of the above normal relationship and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstances leading to the instant crime, and circumstances before and after the instant crime, etc., the judgment of the lower court’s sentencing cannot be deemed to have exceeded the reasonable bounds of discretion.

In addition, there is no change in circumstances that it is unreasonable to maintain the sentencing of the court below in the trial.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.