logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.02.15 2016나6168
부당이득금반환등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as follows: (a) it is not sufficient to acknowledge the defendant's assertion as evidence of the trial of the court of first instance; or (b) it is identical to the part of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the statement of evidence (including the number number) No. 10 to 15 is rejected, which is insufficient to reverse the fact of recognition of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (c) thus, it is acceptable in accordance

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow