A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 1, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 22:55, at around 22:1, 2016, went back to the “H” of the victim I (the 44-year-old), which was the husband of the victim; and (b) took a humping to the N that the victim would return to the N, and (c) took a humping to the N, N, and the victim, with the great desire for the H’s customers, and (d) took a humping to the “Wee Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie you

Along about 10 minutes of disturbance, such as continuing to take a dog in his/her possession on the floor of Mabropos, which interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. Around November 23:10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received 112 reports that the Defendant is prone to disturbance as above; and (b) received the Defendant’s control from the victim P police officers belonging to the O police box who called out, and received the Defendant’s control from the Defendant, I, N, and neighboring residents; (c) the Defendant’s “Ir, Ir, N, and neighboring residents left out of the friende. Irh of the police box. D., there was a reduction in the inner frist of the police box, which is well discarded.

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by speaking as "D.".

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of statutes on each statement protocol to I and P;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes [the scope of the recommended punishment] [the reason for interference with the business] and the basic area (six months to one year and six months) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes (whether a person subject to special sentencing is subject to suspended execution] - The reason for major consideration - The reason for negative previous crimes of the same kind (within five years, suspended execution, or fines not less than three times): The offense of insulting a person subject to suspended execution and not set the sentencing guidelines at least twice adversely: As such, the lower limit of the scope of the recommended sentence for the crime for which the sentencing guidelines set is set is followed.

[Inspection.]