beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The Defendant, at around 12:30 on July 12, 2017, entered the “C” 1st floor of the branch B in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, and moved to the table table, set aside to the victim D (hereinafter “Defendant 26 years of age”) who was an employee prepared for an occupation-oriented company at the front of the main line, who was in preparation for an occupation-oriented company, and forced the victim to have his her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her arm
2. Determination
A. The recognition of the relevant criminal facts ought to be based on strict evidence with probative value that leads a judge to confluence to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. Thus, in a case where the prosecutor’s proof does not sufficiently reach the extent that the defendant’s assertion or defense is inconsistent or unreasonable, it should be determined in the interests of the defendant even if there is suspicion of guilt, such as the defendant’s assertion or defense is inconsistent or unreasonable (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2010Do1487, Apr. 28, 201). (b) In this case, evidence that seems to correspond to the facts charged in the instant case (i) is proved as follows: (i) the defendant’s second police interrogation protocol containing the second police interrogation protocol stating that “I am back to the right side with the Defendant’s hand,” and (ii) the defendant’s statement was found to have never been made by the victim and the victim’s hand.
There is a complaint with D’s content that “The intention of an indecent act is certain that it is an intentional act” (hereinafter “D’s statement 2”) with the content that “the injured person would have avoided the Defendant, but only her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her
According to each of the above evidence, there is a doubt that the defendant intentionally embarrae of the victim's bat, not the victim's bat.
2) However, this Court is legitimate.