logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.05.27 2016고단60
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than nine months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 2, 2012, the Defendant had a large number of households in the store in operation of large-scale furnitures from the Defendant’s house located in G apartment 103 Dong 101, Dong-gu, Gwangju, Seo-gu, Gwangju, to the victim D at the Defendant’s house located in 103 Dong 101.

A loan for the money required to purchase a household is required. The interest of each month shall be paid and the principal shall be paid up to June 24, 2015.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, in fact, the husband of the defendant was in charge of the delivery of the household and did not operate the furniture, and the defendant did not have any specific property or income, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to pay it.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 10 million from the injured party on December 14, 2012 from the injured party, and received KRW 69,30,000 from the time to April 1, 2015, to receive KRW 69,30,000 from the injured party, such as the list of crimes in attached Form, on six occasions, from the injured party.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Partial statement of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the public prosecutor and by the police in each protocol concerning D;

1. A copy of the certificate of borrowing, the details of account transactions, and each description of the certification of contents (in light of the following circumstances, it shall be sufficiently recognized that the defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay the borrowed amount, contrary to the defendant's assertion

① The victim stated in the investigative agency that “at the time when the Defendant first borrowed money, the husband of the Defendant borrowed the goods to make a large amount of money, and thus, he borrowed money to a large amount of money,” and that E, the victim’s children, operated the Defendant’s husband’s household store from the victim’s husband.

The testimony was made in the court.

On the other hand, the defendant's family at the time leased the apartment house owned by the victim to KRW 3 million and KRW 300,000 per month.

arrow