A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 30, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year with prison labor for violating the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. at the Suwon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 7, 2015.

The defendant is the owner of the E (F) who carries on the business without qualification with five facilities, such as five rooms and two shower rooms, by leasing five stories in Young-gu, Suwon-gu D, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si.

Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant was unable to establish a massage place because he was not a massage, the Defendant, in collusion with G who is an employee of the said E, established a massage place by employing three persons, including H (30 years of age), etc. with the nationality of the Thailand, from May 20, 2014 to September 18, 2014, by receiving 60 million won, 80,000 won, 90 won, 80,000 won, 90 won, and 100,000 won, and 100,000 won, 60,000 won, and 90,000 won, from around May 20, 2014 to around September 18, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant and G concerning the police officer;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Sales slips, real estate lease contracts, and field control photographs;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, references to criminal records, case summary information, and application of each statute of the judgment;

1. Articles 87(1)2, 33(2) and 82(3) of the Medical Service Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 and 2 of the Criminal Act is that the defendant committed the crime of this case, under the investigation and trial due to the act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. committed at the instant establishment, and the defendant committed the crime of this case, and the circumstance that the employee of the establishment was peeped in the operator of the establishment is likely to have closed the business of this case, and the judgment becomes final and conclusive.