Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

【2017 order 1362】

1. On April 26, 2017, the Defendant damaged the property by putting the part of the water storage engine of a public telephone, which is the victim corporation established at this place on the street in front of Seocheon-si, Dacheon-si, thereby destroying it in a way that the repair cost is 25,000 won.

2. On April 26, 2017, at around 23:50, the Defendant: (a) 112 reported that the Defendant died of his/her daughter; and (b) the Defendant she spited the said G G’s He/she saw that he/she would be forced to leave the hospital in front of the E Hospital located in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si; and (c) Hambing off the said G G’s He/she was called “Woo Ham Ham Ha,” and she sawd the Defendant at the seat of the E Hospital located in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Do. Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning handling reports 112.

【2017 Highest 1460, Apr. 26, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was placed on the street in front of the J cafeteria located in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si on April 26, 2017; and (b) was able to get off the part of the car owned by the Victim K, which was parked there, so that the repair cost market amount of KRW 100,000 is damaged.

Summary of Evidence

【2017 order 1362】

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A damaged photograph;

1. Each investigation report (the relative number of police officers in charge of damage, replacement of fire and amount of damage) 1460 high group 2017;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The K's statement;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant reflects his mistake; the victim K and the victim K and the victim Kinger Co., Ltd. have agreed smoothly; the defendant deposited KRW 500,000 for the police G and H.