1. The Defendant’s KRW 68,685,375 to the Plaintiffs, as well as 5% per annum from April 4, 2014 to April 29, 2014.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiffs are persons jointly engaged in various kinds of raw materials import and wholesale retail sales business under the trade name of "D", and the defendant is a person who engages in the manufacturing business of finished products by purchasing originals with the trade name of "E".

B. From March 29, 2013 to March 14, 2014, the Plaintiffs supplied original intent to the Defendant. The Plaintiffs did not receive KRW 68,685,375 out of the original price.

【Ground for recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap Nos. 1 and 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. According to the above facts finding as to the cause of the claim, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiffs the above 68,685,375 won as the price for the original goods, and the damages for delay calculated by the ratio of 5% per annum as prescribed by the Civil Act from April 4, 2014 to April 29, 2014, the delivery date of the original copy of the payment order in this case, which is the delivery date of the original copy of the payment order in this case, and 20% per annum as prescribed by the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the following day to

B. The defendant's defense is asserted to the effect that the damage caused by the defects of the original contractor supplied by the plaintiffs should be deducted from the price of the goods. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the defects of the original contractor supplied by the plaintiffs, and the defendant's defense is rejected without examining any further.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition with the assent of all participating Justices.