The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one hundred months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. There are extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant is recognized and reflected in the crime, that there has been an agreement with the victim, that the family and branch of the defendant want to take the lead of the defendant, and that the defendant's family and branch want to leave the ship.

However, the defendant has been punished five times for violent crimes (four times for punishment, one time for suspended execution), and in particular, the defendant has a fluorous relationship with her mother, who has been in a fluoral relationship.

on the ground that the relationship is likely to be wide for his family members.

Intimidating KRW 60 million by intimidation and committing a crime of destruction of special property, special residence intrusion, bodily injury, special intimidation, habitual intimidation, etc. against the above women on February 3, 2016, upon being sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on July 8, 2016, the above judgment was finalized on July 8, 2016, and two months later, the victim of this case, who is another female, as the victim of this case, is the Hague.

In light of the fact that a person repeatedly commits a crime with almost similar contents to exercise violence and to intimidation as a dangerous object on the ground that he/she committed such crime, a sentence of imprisonment is inevitable.

In full view of such circumstances and other circumstances as the Defendant’s age, environment, sexual conduct, circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, and the circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, it is not determined that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.