(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.07.29 2016고단215

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.07.29 2016고단215

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 21, 2014, the Defendant was found in a M business place operated by the Victim L, and “The present game room is operated in the North Yong-do,” and the Defendant tried to additionally operate the game room in Daegu.

If an investment is made to the head of the game to start a new game in Daegu, the false statement was made that the remainder after deducting the operating expenses of the game from daily sales would be divided into 50:50.

However, the defendant had already entered into a partnership agreement with N in addition to the victim before the proposal above. N in part of the open cost of N in the game room, and the second floor of the building located in the Seogu P in the N in Daegu as the father of N in order to operate the game room is leased without compensation, N in the game room management duties are in charge of N in the game room management duties, and the defendant agreed that N in the condition that Q will take charge of preparation for and other management duties for open opening in the game room, 30% of profits, 20% of profits, 50% of profits, and 50% of profits of the defendant. The above North Korean game room was already in the process of arranging the business. The defendant did not know that the victim was another partner participating in the operation of the game room and that it was not an investment in the above game room if he knew that it had not been properly operated.

Accordingly, on November 7, 2014, the Defendant received 250,000 won from the damaged party to the Busan Bank account under the name of the Defendant for the purchase of mobile phones related to the operation of the above game room. From that time to December 1, 2014, the Defendant received a total of KRW 39,360,000 from that time to December 1, 2014.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. The Defendant who forged a private document shall be from the above L on the pretext of the cost of lease.

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2016.06.23 2015고단8670

-대전지방법원 2017.03.30 2016고단282

-부산지방법원 2016.06.09 2016고단1393

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.06.23 2016고단246

-대구지방법원 2016.06.03 2015노2590