logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2014.11.13 2014구합10306
손실보상금증액
Text

1. The defendant,

A. 15,475,190 won to Plaintiff B and 5% per annum from March 15, 2014 to November 13, 2014, respectively.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) The approval and public notice of the project - the name of the project: F general industrial complex development project (hereinafter “instant project”): The public notice of the project: G, etc. (public notice of the determination of road zones) on February 15, 2013 - the project operator: the defendant

(b) The ruling of expropriation made on January 14, 2014 by the Chungcheongbuk-do Regional Land Tribunal - The date of expropriation: March 14, 2014 - The land subject to expropriation and compensation for losses: The land subject to expropriation shall be comprised of H land located at Chungcheongnam-si (hereinafter referred to as “the following parcel numbers”) and the detailed land and compensation for losses shall be as listed below:

(3) The following land to be expropriated is classified as “each of the instant land”; - No. 1/19,430,50 2 J 1,237 1/129,193, 303 K 3,306 1/17,195, 300 3,306 3,306 3,306 1/17, 177, 306 1/17, 195, 306 1/17, 195, 100 2,30, 205, 205, 30, 208, 201/6, 30, 306, 16/10, 105, 2, 1201/60, 630, 760, 7606N 1/630, 106, 184, 167

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) The appraisal based on which the expropriation decision was based is erroneous in the selection of comparative standard land, etc., and thus it is unlawful or unjust to excessively lower the amount of compensation for each of the lands of this case. Thus, the compensation for each of the lands of this case shall be the appraiser T in this Court (hereinafter

(2) The Plaintiff A shall have increased the difference between the result of a supplementary appraisal commission and the amount of compensation set forth in the adjudication of acceptance.

arrow