1. The Defendant connects the Plaintiff with each point of the attached Table 9, 10, 14, 15, and 9, among the land size of 165 square meters in Tong-gu, Dong-si.

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff is the owner of 165m2 (hereinafter “instant land”).

The Defendant is the owner of land No. 1 and D large 238 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) and the light-scale steel structure 0.5 tons of a light steel structure on the ground, which is the owner of the instant land and D large 238 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) and 75.63 square meters of single-story housing (hereinafter “instant building”).

Matters concerning the change in ownership of the land and buildings of this case are as follows:

On September 25, 1995, the date of receipt of the building of this case No. 2, the date of receipt of the building of this case No. 2, which was the date of receipt of the building of this case, purchased the building of this case from G on March 16, 2017, with the land of this case No. 2, from September 25, 2008, the Defendant purchased the building of this case from G on September 25, 2008, with the attached appraisal No. 9, 10, 14, 15, and 9 in sequence among the land of this case, from September 25, 2008 to September 21, 1994, the date of receipt of the building of this case, which was the cause for registration of ownership owner as of the date of receipt of the building of this case. The building of this case, which had been sold by compulsory auction on Sep. 22, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as "the part of this case").

Of the instant land No. 1, the Defendant occupies part (B) of 35 square meters inboard (hereinafter “the instant part (B)”) that connects each point of the attached Table No. 1,2, 11, 12, 13, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 1 in sequence, among the land in the instant case.

The part of this case (C) is part contained in the part of this case (b).

【In the absence of any dispute, there is no ground for recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 10, and 11, and the result of the court’s request for measurement and appraisal of the Korea Land Information Corporation, the plaintiff’s assertion by the parties to the judgment as to the ground for claim of the whole purport of pleading is the owner of the land No. 1, including the part of this case(b). Thus, the defendant is the owner of the land of this case.