The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The lower court rendered a sentence that considers sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., in light of the unfavorable circumstances that the Defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, and that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime, the confession, reflectment, and cooperation in the investigation.

The above sentencing conditions have changed in the court of the other hand.

There is no reason to see the above sentencing, and when comprehensively considering the scope of the recommendation of sentencing guidelines for the relevant crimes and narcotics crimes [the scope of the sentencing guidelines (as referred to in items (b) and (c)) in the basic area (as referred to in items (i) to (ii) and (ii) in October to 2], the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.