The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal - The lower court’s punishment (a prison term of four years, additional collection of ten million won) is too heavy.

2. There is no particular change in sentencing conditions compared with the original judgment, since new sentencing materials have not been submitted at the trial of the original judgment.

In full view of the reasons for sentencing cited by the court below, in particular, the defendant did not know about seven or more years of imprisonment with prison labor and completed the execution of the sentence, and did not know about the fact that he committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime, including the fact that the victims still want to be punished by the defendant, and various sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the result of the application of the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court Sentencing Committee, the court below's punishment is too too excessive and exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (as long as the court below's decision is maintained against the defendant, the part of the compensation order as cited by the court below