(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.10.15 2014나2031804

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.10.15 2014나2031804

손해배상(기)

Text

1. All appeals by the plaintiffs and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain in this judgment are as follows: (a) the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows; and (b) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the addition of the judgment of the defendant as stated in Paragraph (3) below; and (c) thus, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence

2. Parts to be dried;

A. The fifth part of the first instance judgment stating that “When preparing an audit report on March 22, 2011,” “as of March 12, 2011, preparing an audit report (No. 2)” was written by the court of first instance No. 21.

B. Part 7 of the 7th decision of the first instance court stating, “The defendant’s appeal was dismissed. The defendant appealed to the Supreme Court Decision 2014Du11359, but the Supreme Court again dismissed the defendant’s appeal as of November 27, 2014.”

(c) Article 15, 18, 21, 26, 27 of the 7th sentence of the first instance court shall be written by inserting the “Evidence Nos. 15, 18, 21, 26, 27 of the A, and Nos. 2 and 4 of the A.

Article 10 of the 7th sentence of the first instance court's decision "an article that the defendant received contact from the management of the Yangyang Global and audited the wrong audit during the period" shall be construed as "an article that the defendant received contact from the management of the Yangyang Global and audited the wrong audit" on August 5, 201.

(e) Forms 7 through 13 of the decision of the first instance shall be followed by the following:

Considering all the evidence submitted by the Defendant to the trial and the circumstances of the assertion, the evidence presented by the Defendant to the trial.

Even if the plaintiffs are actually aware of the existence of false entries, etc. in the audit report of this case around October 16, 201, which is the end of the suspension period of the large global trading, it is insufficient to recognize that there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

In addition, as alleged by the defendant, the "Defendant on August 5, 2011" is the Grand Global.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2017.06.15 2017나2012262

-대전고등법원 2019.11.06 2018나12160

-서울고등법원 2018.11.01 2018나2023979

-제주지방법원 2021.02.02 2020나10671

-서울고등법원 2017.06.08 2016나2081476