The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) did not err by misapprehending the facts charged in the instant case, but the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged.

2. The lower court determined that ① the victim’s statement of indecent act from the 112 reporting immediately after the crime to the court of the lower court was not likely to have shown in a concrete and consistent manner, and there was no circumstance to make a false statement; ② the witness’s statement corresponds to the victim’s statement and most of the victim’s statement, and the Defendant did not force the victim to leave the victim’s bucks.

The statement, ③ the Defendant also faces losses on the victim’s chests, buckbucks, hand hand, etc.

Based on the fact that the charges of this case are recognized, the court found guilty.

In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the above judgment of the court below is justified.

In addition, according to the video CDs submitted by the prosecutor through the improvement of the chemical quality and expansion in a single trial, the defendant is observe from 18:03:46 on the day of the instant case to the victim from 18:04 to 18:04:07 on the day of the instant case, and the fact that he is going beyond the victim's body with the victim's body at around 18:04:11 on the day of the instant case, and is consistent with the victim's statement by observing around 18:04:31 on the face of the damaged person's hand.

Therefore, since there is no error in the judgment of the court below as above, the defendant's above assertion cannot be accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.