logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2012.06.22 2010고합868
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendants are not the authorized person handling narcotics, but Defendant B imported psychotropic drugs from China on May 17, 2010, and detained them, and at the Incheon detention center, Defendant A, who visited himself, was allowed to take the front place when informing Defendant A of the crimes charged with handling philopon to the prosecution. Accordingly, Defendant A was able to take the front place. On May 25, 2010, Defendant A asked Defendant A to request Defendant A, a type of selling the philopon, who visited himself, to exchange D with “d making a place of work and inform Defendant A of the crimes charged with handling philopon on behalf of Defendant B in lieu of a fine of KRW 15 million.”

Upon receipt of the above request, D intended to engage in the "public work" in the investigation or trial of Defendant B by informing him of the information about the smuggling import of the penphones, which makes it possible for Defendant B to be placed in the line by creating the reason for the normal participation in the investigation or trial. Around that time, Mexico contacted F who carried the penphones into Korea from Mexico to the one who carried the penphones into Korea and informed him of the information about the revenue of the penphones. Around that time, F had not been asked for sending the penphones to him, even though G who had been aware of before that time did not actually asked him/her to send the penphones, it decided to provide D with the information by sending the penphones to the above G, and thereby, D intended to inform the investigation agency of the processed pens case.

D) The F sent 15 million won to the purchase cost of phiphonephones, and if the public work is successful, the F sent 10 million won to the case cost. On June 2010, 2010, the F explained that the Defendant A was made to communicate with F, prior to the convenience store near the H hotel in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, and explained this situation.

Defendant

On June 4, 2010, A explained the above circumstances to Defendant B in the Incheon Southern-dong, Incheon-do, and Defendant B.

arrow