1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff had a loan claim of KRW 179,200,000 against D, the former owner of each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each real estate of this case”).

D On October 23, 2017, the Defendants entered into a pre-contract and sales contract for each of the instant real estate (hereinafter “instant pre-contract and sales contract”) with the Defendants.

Therefore, the instant reservation and sales contract constitute a fraudulent act.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and 8 (including the paper numbers), the plaintiff, Eul, and Dong N, the father of the plaintiff, the plaintiff, from July 2009 to D, began to lend money at D's request; the plaintiff, E, and F, from October 20, 2017, each claim amounting to KRW 179,200,000, KRW 40,000, KRW 214,850,000, KRW 200; on October 30, 2017, the plaintiff filed an application for provisional seizure on the real estate of this case with D's name; on October 30, 2017, "The plaintiff (A) was subject to provisional seizure on the real estate of KRW 30,000, KRW 17,000; on October 21, 2017, the defendant's right to claim provisional seizure on each of the real estate of this case.

In the process of receiving reimbursement of KRW 230,000,000 as above, D entered into a sales contract with the Defendant for each of the instant real estate.