A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a bicycle.

At around 14:30 on May 11, 2013, the Defendant was proceeding the bicycle lane of the Han River Water Site located in the pressure-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, in the direction of the Young River.

It is a narrow bicycle that frequently passes through bicycles, and there have been many bicycles travelling from the weekend at the time. Therefore, if a bicycle riding service provider stops suddenly, a bicycle has a duty of care to ensure a sufficient distance to avoid collision.

Nevertheless, without securing the safety distance, the Defendant got the victim's front wheel part of the bicycle driven by the Defendant with the front wheel part of the bicycle driven by the Defendant without securing the safety distance and caused the victim to go beyond the floor.

The Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment due to occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each suspect interrogation protocol (A, B);

1. Statement (C);

1. A written statement on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Each written diagnosis (C) and medical examination and treatment;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the victim's injury, cover photographs and accident site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment is that the instant accident and the injury of the victim were caused by the negligence of the Defendant and the negligence of the Defendant, and the negligence of the B in the process is somewhat larger than the negligence of the Defendant, the amount of the fine issued to B, the summary order issued to B, the circumstances in which the Defendant and the victim did not reach an agreement on the instant accident, and the fact that the Defendant did not have any criminal record and the mistake are divided.