(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.12.11 2014고정1646

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.12.11 2014고정1646

집회및시위에관한법률위반

Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A and Defendant A in violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act are joint representatives of the “E Council” and the “F Committee” chairman, and Defendant B is the head of the Secretariat of the “E Council” member.

A person who intends to hold an outdoor assembly or demonstration shall submit a report on it to the chief of the competent police station from 720 hours to 48 hours before commencing the outdoor assembly or demonstration.

At around 11:00 on February 6, 2014, the Defendants held meetings with the members of various organizations affiliated with the “E” office located in the “G Union” office located in the head of the “G Union,” and decided to hold a prior assembly of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy in order to demand the blank of the plan for construction of street-based dams, and the society of the assembly was determined to be seen as Defendant B.

Accordingly, from around 11:00 to from around 12:30 on February 11, 2014, the Defendants prepared more than 35 members of the “E Meeting” under the supervision of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy of the Sejong Government Office as well as more than 10 clocket containing words, such as “Aroman assistance development plan,” “Aroman assistance development plan,” and “Aroman assistance development plan,” etc., and then, using loudspeakers, “the outer space arbitration, the progress of the project, resident conflicts, etc.” using loudspeakers. The Ministry of Environment, which submitted an environmental impact assessment report disregarding the administrative procedures, issued a statement to the effect that “The Ministry of Environment is immediately returned,” and “Aromo assistance dam construction plan,” and the participants failed to enter the meeting as the police proposal of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, and Energy.

However, the Defendants did not submit in advance the report on the above assembly to the chief of the competent police station.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to hold an unreported outdoor assembly.

2. Defendant C’s obstruction of performance of official duties.

참조조문

-집회 및 시위에 관한 법률

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2014.11.13 2012고정2772

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.01.17 2011고정2875

-창원지방법원 2015.12.17 2014고단577

-광주지방법원 2015.10.02 2015고정1337

-수원지방법원 2012.11.08 2011고정3094