logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.05.19 2015고단6008
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 4, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in front of the underground parking lot located in the second apartment of the 15-0-Gu, Yong-gu, Yong-gu, Yong-do, 15-0, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol on the road in front of the underground parking lot in the second apartment of the 2nd apartment complex, “A human being is being used.” The police commander D, who belongs to the police box of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Young-gu, Incheon, which was called upon the 112 report, marks the Defendant to have the Defendant invalid, “Ciffe, Ma, Ma., Ma., the police.”

The bit of bitch bitch, “I do not separate the bitch,” and the flusium was spited on the floor of the police box, spiting the left part of the said D with a strong flusium once, and spiting the cellular phone, paper, etc. after moving to C police box several times, and spiting it on the floor.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written E;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the purpose of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and the content and method of the instant crime, etc., the sentence is ordered as per Disposition, taking into account the following factors: (a) although the nature of the instant crime is somewhat weak; (b) the Defendant’s mistake is recognized and contradictory; and (c) the police officer suffering from the Defendant’s preference to the Defendant; and (d) the Defendant’s age and sexual behavior is considered as a whole; and (c) the overall sentencing conditions indicated in the record, including the Defendant

arrow