The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the president of the D Union consisting of 22 owners of land outside the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu, and 27.

On March 4, 2008, the Defendant decided to purchase the 32-year apartment units sold in lots, and entered into a new sales contract with the victim E who paid KRW 200 million out of the sales price.

In other words, the victim E filed a lawsuit claiming the return of the sale price against the above union on October 26, 2009, and adjusted with the union on October 26, 2009. The contents of the mediation are the F apartment 101,203, the F apartment 100,000 won “380,000 won” in the indictment of KRW 385,00,000,000.

It is clear that 200 million won paid to the union is a clerical error in the letter of indictment for part payments.

The remainder KRW 30 million, out of the remainder KRW 185 million, is a down payment, and the amount of KRW 1550 million in the remainder indictment is a clerical error in the remaining indictment.

On the other hand, until November 5, 2009, the victim concluded a new contract for sale in lots, and the victim implemented the procedure of withdrawal and cancellation of the application for provisional seizure of the right to claim ownership transfer registration with the guarantee insurance of the victim as the third debtor until November 5, 2009.

According to the above mediation, the defendant had the victim and the above apartment 101 Dong 203 in advance of a new sales contract for the above apartment 101 unit 203, and on September 30, 2009, after the completion of the above apartment 6 billion won, the plaintiff was urged from G, the contractor, to pay for the unsold apartment 70% at the discounted price of 70%. In addition, around October 21 of the same year, the defendant was notified of the provisional attachment against the above 13 units and commercial building 5 units unsold in lots from the head of the H team, the manager in charge of the above apartment site, and in fact on November 3 of the same year, the defendant was notified of the provisional attachment against the 13 units, including the victim's apartment.