1. The Defendant’s KRW 8,310,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from November 19, 2015 to March 3, 2017.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a legal entity that completed the registration of incorporation on November 2, 199 for the purpose of the installation construction business, etc. (2) The Defendant is a non-profit medical corporation that completed the registration of incorporation on February 22, 201 for the purpose of the establishment and operation business of a medical institution.

B. 1) The Defendant shall conclude the instant construction contract for effective comprehensive construction technology (hereinafter “effective comprehensive construction”).

A) On the ground of land A and one (1) Namyang-si, Namyang-si, the Construction Corporation for New Long-Term Care Hospital B (hereinafter “instant Construction Corporation”).

(2) Since December 30, 2014, an effective comprehensive construction project was being performed from around December 30, 2014, and on January 7, 2015, the construction period for the part of “facilities (construction, fire, gas, medical gas, air cooling, heating, etc.)” during the said construction project was determined and subcontracted as KRW 836,00,00 (including additional taxes) for the said construction project to the Plaintiff from January 8, 2015 to August 10, 2015.

(3) The Plaintiff, from around that time, performed the instant installation work. On January 23, 2015, the Korea Facilities and equipment Construction Guarantee Association issued a contract guarantee with the coverage amounting to KRW 836,00,000 for the instant installation work, and the guarantee period from January 7, 2015 to August 10, 2015, and issued it to the Korea Effica comprehensive Construction. C. The integrated construction of Efficacy was suspended on February 10, 2015.

2) On March 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) concluded with the Plaintiff that “the Defendant would directly pay the construction cost that was not paid by the comprehensive construction in respect of the instant facility project that was in progress by the Plaintiff” (hereinafter “each of the instant agreements”).

was drawn up.

The main contents of each letter of this case are as follows.

Written Consent of Mutual Agreement

2. The “Defendant A” and “B” enter into a contract with a comprehensive construction project for filial duty and enter into a contract with each other.