1. The Defendant’s KRW 6,447,00 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from March 9, 2017 to May 12, 2017.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The party status of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building was newly constructed around October 2002. The Plaintiff is the owner of the said B02 (hereinafter “instant lending”). The Defendant is the owner of the instant lending No. 101 (hereinafter “instant 101”).

The parking lot is located next to the loan of this case and next to the 101th floor of this case.

B. On August 3, 2015, the Plaintiff heard from the lessee, who was living in the instant loan, that water was generated from the ceiling and the wall, and the water was confirmed from the ceiling. The Plaintiff thought that the cause of water leakage in various circumstances was attributable to the floor pipe of the instant case, which is the above story. On August 3, 2015, the Plaintiff sent a letter of mail proving that “the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to take prompt measures, which would be watered to the following story,” and that “the Plaintiff did not obtain the Defendant’s active cooperation. However, on the following grounds, the Plaintiff did not perform the construction work in the instant loan site and carried out the construction work in the first place on August 24, 2015, the sum of the construction cost incurred from the construction work in the first place (cost) and the construction work in the first place on August 24, 2015, the Plaintiff did not take any further measures from August 20, 200, 200.

Therefore, the tenant did not reside any longer and did not get a director to another place in early 2016.

3. On March 5, 2016, the Plaintiff concluded a lease agreement with D to lease the instant loan with the term of KRW 130,00,000, and from April 29, 2016 to April 29, 2018, the Plaintiff received the said lease deposit and delivered the instant loan on April 29, 2016.

The plaintiff is a brokerage commission for the same day 390.