The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. It constitutes fraud to borrow KRW 30 million from the victim without notifying the victim of the fact that the defendant had been in excess of his/her liability at the time of mistake of facts, and constitutes fraud.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court (one year of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution) is excessively unjustifiable and unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. The gist of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, by deceiving the victim “no other damage” and by deceiving the victim, each of the costs KRW 120 million from the victim, around March 2016, and KRW 30 million from November 2, 2016.

In addition, the lower court, around November 2, 2016 of the facts charged in the instant case, dismissed the victim in the same manner as indicated in the facts charged at the time the Defendant borrowed the said KRW 30 million from the Defendant around November 2, 2016.

It is judged that there is no intention to commit fraud or to commit a crime, and that there is a lack of evidence to recognize it, and not guilty.

나. 살피건대 ① 피해자의 진술에 의하더라도, 피고인은 3,000만 원을 피해자로부터 빌릴 당시 ‘인천 중구 H에서 짬뽕식당을 하려고 하는데 돈이 필요하다’며 돈을 빌려달라고만 하였을 뿐 다른 방법으로 피해자를 기망한 것은 없는 것으로 보이는 점, ② 피해자는 피고인에게 돈을 빌려주게 된 이유에 대하여 ‘피고인이 넓은 장소에서 짬뽕집을 운영한다고 하고, 기존에 빌린 돈에 대하여 이자도 잘 지급하고 있어서 돈을 빌려주었다’고 진술한 점, ③ 피고인은 2017. 1.경부터 실제로 식당을 운영하고 있는 점 등의 사정에 비추어 보면, 비록 피고인이 위 3,000만 원을 빌릴 당시 피해자에게 자신의 채무 상황에 대하여 적극적으로 알리지 않은 사정은 있지만 그러한 사정만으로는 피고인이 피해자를 기망하였다고 보기 어렵다.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below is just, and the prosecutor's allegation in this part is without merit.

3. Unreasonable sentencing.