logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원김천지원 2020.11.05 2019가단36062
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 20,571,395 with respect to the Plaintiff and Defendant B from June 13, 2019 to December 21, 2019.

Reasons

1. Facts recognized;

A. Party status and relationship 1) The Plaintiff is a company running trucking transport business, etc. as its intended business, and Defendant B is an employee who served as the Plaintiff’s truck (vehicle number: D) driver from April 2018 to June 23, 2019. (2) The Defendant C is a person who, from around 2009, operates the water surface in the name of “F” and runs the business of purchasing scrap iron.

B. Defendants’ act related to the instant dispute 1) The Plaintiff is a company G around June 2019 (hereinafter “G”).

From SCR 8.0M Corresponding Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Guri-ray Co., Ltd.”).

(2) Around June 13, 2019, Defendant B was entrusted with six carriages, and accordingly, Defendant B loaded six of the above clateral clateral clateral clateral clateral clateral clateral clateral clateral clateral clateral clateral clateral clateral. (2) around June 13, 2019, Defendant B sold one of the above clateral clater’s clateral clateral clateral clateral clateral clateral clateral clateral cl

3) Thereafter, around 09:00 on June 14, 2019, Defendant B transported 5 of the remainder of the copper Line Co., Ltd., the supplier of G, to the I Co., Ltd., the supplier of G. In addition, the Defendant C, around that time, sold to the third party one of the above copper Line Co., Ltd. purchased from Defendant B, thereby disposing of it. C. The Plaintiff’s compensation measures as above without permission (hereinafter “instant disposal disposition”).

In relation to the Plaintiff and G agreed on the reimbursement proposal around July 1, 2019, and accordingly, the Plaintiff paid G 30,571,395 won (i.e., KRW 4,215km x KRW 7,253 won) to G around that time. D. After the process of the relevant criminal case, Defendant B was convicted of the facts constituting an occupational embezzlement in relation to the instant disposition.

2. Meanwhile, the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on November 8, 2019 to Defendant C.

arrow