logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.05.01 2012고단3787
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

The defendant is an applicant for compensation of KRW 110,00,00 and the application for compensation to C, who is an applicant for compensation.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant began to borrow money from the neighbors in order to pretend that the husband, who had made an investment in the shares of the husband before about 20 years ago, would normally take care of the household with the money coming from the husband. The Defendant did not have any particular property or income, and the Defendant did not have the ability to fully borrow money from the victims, for instance, in 2006, due to the Defendant’s interest burden, i.e., the repayment of the principal and interest of the debt by borrowing the money from another person when the due date for repayment of the principal and interest of the debt comes due to the absence of any other property or income, and the debt was over KRW 200 million in 206, and there was no longer a situation where it is difficult to borrow money from other persons, and the victim D, who was aware of it as the victim D, did not know of the fact that the husband was a business of the Defendant operating the factory of the shipbuilding machinery and equipment, and it was necessary to construct a new factory. However, the Defendant did not have the ability to fully borrow the money from the victim.

On September 11, 2006, the Defendant made a false statement to the above victim in the Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, the Busan Metropolitan City, the Busan Metropolitan City, the Seoul Metropolitan City, Inc., which was located in Gangseo-gu, Busan Metropolitan City on September 11, 2006, stating that “It is difficult for the Defendant to newly establish a factory in the Busan Metropolitan City, where he had the existing factory, which was operated by the Nam-do, left well, and he had the factory in the Busan Metropolitan City before selling the existing factory, and if he had the factory in the Busan Metropolitan City before selling it, he would sell the house inherited in Daegu and repay it.”

However, in fact, when borrowing money from the victim, it was thought that it will be used to pay the principal and interest of the debt borrowed from other persons, and there was no land set up in Kimhae-si, so there was no plan for the husband of the defendant to build a new factory, and the inheritance real estate located in Daegu was already disposed of.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such and belongs to it from the victim.

arrow