logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.06.18 2012가합12729
부당이득금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a Korean legal entity that runs the maritime transport business, etc., and the Plaintiff is the owner of D, a limited liability company E (hereinafter “E”).

(E) is a juridical person established for entry into Korea. E further on September 18, 2006, is F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) in the Republic of Korea.

[Plaintiff] Along with Japan (hereinafter “G”)

(2) The Plaintiff and E’s representative director and F’s auditor were the Defendant Limited Company B (hereinafter “Defendant B”) are Japanese corporations operating vessel repair business, etc., and Defendant C (hereinafter “Defendant C”) is a Korean corporation operating vessel repair business as the subordinate company of Defendant B.

B. H refers to the Plaintiff, E, and F.

In 2003, the Plaintiff was performing the business of collecting and transporting sea sand by being awarded a contract from the Seocho Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Santin Construction”). At the time, H was only holding the Rabbro sand collection and transport vessel that can be collected up to 20 meters in depth.

C. On June 19, 2003, the Plaintiff purchased 20,000 UN parts of the pump (in the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the case of the

2) On November 5, 2003, 2003, G ordered Defendant B to implement a construction project for converting D and I’s possession into a pump-type gathering line, and entered into two contracts with the following content: (a) The Plaintiff, Seocho Construction, and Defendant C’s name (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

....

arrow