1. As to KRW 72,181,522 and KRW 44,800,00 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff the year from February 12, 2014 to September 13, 2017.

Basic Facts

C, as a defendant's employee in 2005, has been performing duties in charge of compensation for the housing site development projects in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, which was developed by the defendant, means that the sale price is supplied or commercial site is supplied to farmers to be included in the site for the housing site development projects on or around June 2005.

hereinafter referred to as "ordinary sovereignty" is simply a "ordinary sovereignty."

The mother of E, who is an employee of the same fee, acquired 2 greenhouses from D that could no longer be granted the right to occupy commercial buildings, and registered in the name of F and P in the name of E.

On the end of May 2007, the Plaintiff was recommended by H representative I to purchase the commercial share certificates related to G’s vinyl, and the Defendant entered G’s resident registration number and confirmed the specifications of compensation for losses (Evidence A No. 13) that paid the agricultural compensation amount of KRW 987,50 to one vinyl.

On June 26, 2007, after entering into a contract to sell to 75,000,000, J in the first floor coffee shop with the above I representing the above I (hereinafter “the subject matter of sale in this case”), and I immediately entered into a contract to sell to the Plaintiff, who was waiting for the immediately next table of the same coffee shop, in the same amount of KRW 118,00,000,000, and received the payment from the Plaintiff in full.

The plaintiff asked G, etc. on March 2008 because the right to occupy the commercial area on the subject matter of the sale of this case did not go to the right to occupy the commercial area, but even if G, etc. had no right to occupy the commercial area, it seems to refer to the supply of the land for the commercial

A. On May 8, 2013, when he was waiting to move, he was notified by the Defendant of the cancellation of the equity interest, and was informed of the fact that he was guilty, and reported the internal audit request and irregularities against the Defendant, an employee, and filed a complaint against I, C, and G on the charge of fraud.