1. He/she confirms that a will by means of a self-certificated document of April 20, 2014, written in the separate sheet of the deceased C is valid.

2...

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant are children of deceased C (Death on October 21, 2015, hereinafter “the deceased”).

B. On April 20, 2014, the annexed testament in the name of the deceased and the annexed testament of April 20, 2014 (hereinafter “instant testament”).

C. The testamentary book of this case contains the full text, date, address, and name, and the name is affixed with the name’s unmanned seal affixed to the right side of the deceased.

On November 9, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Seoul Family Court Decision 2015 Ma10658, the Seoul Family Court, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant affixed the seal of approval on January 14, 2016. The Plaintiff stated that the body and the unmanneds of the testament are the same as the deceased, but the Defendant stated that the body and the unmanneds of the testament of this case may not be aware of the deceased, and that the contents of the will may not be consented.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Gap's 1 through 3, 5, and 6 (including each number in the case of virtual numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Defendant’s main defense against the Defendant’s main defense is proceeding with the Seoul Family Court (Seoul Family Court Decision 2015 Ma30353) with the Plaintiff and the Defendant, and the validity of a will is also a key issue in the above case involving the division of inherited property. Thus, in the instant lawsuit, the Plaintiff did not have any interest in confirming the validity of a will’s will.