logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.10.23 2013고정2193
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 2012, the Defendant stated that “A victim C, who is claiming a business that purchases B department stores in a large amount at low prices and refluently sells B department stores in order to buy gift certificates at low prices at the department stores at the time.” However, the Defendant was unable to purchase a large quantity of gift certificates at the department stores at the time of government policies. Moreover, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to allow the victim to purchase B department stores at low prices due to the lack of any specific relationship with B department stores.

1. Nevertheless, on January 18, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “In order to purchase B/B gift certificates in a fixed and low-level manner, a person in charge of the department store must be in charge of personnel management in order to purchase B/B gift certificates.” Accordingly, 50,000 won was remitted from the victim on the same day.

2. On February 11, 2012, the Defendant continued to call a victim’s phone, stating that “I would like to provide meals at the B department store staff in a locking room, and would make good if you paid meal expenses,” and received KRW 100,000 on the same day from the victim.”

3. Then, on February 13, 2012, the Defendant called the victim’s phone and received two million won from the victim on the same day on the same day on the ground that the Defendant received a remittance from the victim on the following grounds: “The design cost should be paid in the underground of the D building, which may be leased two million won or more; whether it may be lent; whether it is a day-to-day remittance; and if it is not possible to pay the interior expenses at the present time, it would have a bad influence on the purchase of merchandise coupons because the credit on the side of the B department store is far away.”

As a result, the defendant got a total of 2.6 million won through three times by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow