logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.02.02 2017노3372
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(특수준강간)등
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable (4 years of suspended execution of three years of imprisonment for each term, 3 years of protection observation, 120 hours of community service, 80 hours of lecture).

2. However, the court below held that the defendants' joint crime committed by the defendants was a case of sexual intercourse with the defendant A and C's friendly arrest victims who were under the influence of alcohol, and the defendants were forced to have sexual intercourse. The defendants were forced to have their own errors by recognizing all of the crimes of this case, the defendants did not have any favorable power before and after the crime of this case was committed, and the victim J was rescued. In the absence of their report, the victim J was at the risk of death with a low temperature. The victims J was under considerable mental suffering after the crime of this case was committed by the defendants, and the defendants A had taken pictures of the above victim's bridge against the victim's will against the above victim's Ma. The defendants did not want to commit each crime of this case, and the defendants did not want to have any other criminal acts of this case, and the defendants did not have any favorable motive and punishment for the defendant, and did not have any other factors such as punishment for the defendant's 's sexual intercourse before the crime of this case, and did not have any motive and punishment for the defendant.

In addition to the circumstances indicated by the court below, no new circumstance exists to change the sentence of the court below in the court below, and considering the aforementioned various circumstances and all sentencing factors as seen in the argument of this case, it does not seem unfair because the sentence imposed by the court below to the defendants is too large.

Therefore, the Defendants’ above.

arrow