A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

On June 15, 2016, the Defendant driven a C Poter Cargo within approximately 300 meters from the 388-2nd road in the beginning of Gwangju City to the front road of the SCR hospital located in the same Ri without obtaining a driver's license for a motor vehicle around 20:50 on June 15, 2016.

On August 10, 2016, the Defendant driven a DWz car from around 388-2 of the beginning month of Gwangju-si to the roads near the police box of the same Eup/Myeon without obtaining a driver's license of around 10:50 on August 10, 2016.

On October 20, 2016, the Defendant driven a C Poter truck without obtaining a driver's license from around 3.8 km to around 3.8 meters from the front side of the 263's Macuri-ro 263's Macuri-ro, Seoul, the early early 2013:30 on October 20, 2016.

around 19:05 on March 24, 2017, the Defendant driven D-Wenz car at approximately 2 km from the front side of the Dogri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri 113 in the city of Gwangju to the front side of the re-owned apartment in the 113-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri of the same city without a driver's license.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 2043"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Photographs of operating vehicles and the ledger of driver's licenses "2016 Highest 2479";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. "Motor vehicle driver's license ledger (Revocation) 2016 Highest 3482;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. "Motor vehicle driver's license ledger 2017 Highest 690";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to output the driver's license ledger;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 152 subparagraph 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, for the crime;

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes seems to be both confessions and reflects the fact that the defendant was committed, but even though the same record was several times, it is deemed that the defendant continues to repeat the crime without any liability for the crime.