logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.12.18 2015고정1626
부정수표단속법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. From November 5, 2007, the summary of the facts charged, the Defendant entered into a check with the branch of the Industrial Bank of Korea and the Defendant’s name and traded household checks.

around December 2010, the Defendant issued four copies of the household check of KRW 20,000,000 in the name of the Defendant, which is named as “E”, “5,000,000,000”, and “the date of issuance” as “the date of April 17, 2011” in the “D office operated by the Defendant in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sung-si, as indicated in the attached crime list, and issued four copies of the household check of KRW 20,000,000 in the face value as indicated in the attached list of crimes, each of which the holder of each check presented payment proposal on April 18, 201, which is within the period of presentment for payment, but did not receive each shortage of

2. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 2(2) and (1) of the Illegal Check Control Act, and where checks are recovered pursuant to Article 2(4) of the same Act, which cannot be prosecuted. According to the trial records of this case, the defendant can be found to have recovered each check indicated in the annexed list prior to the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow