1. The defendant is based on the executory exemplification of the payment order issued by the Jeonju District Court in the Jeonju District Court in D.

On July 9, 2018, based on the executory exemplification of the payment order (hereinafter “the original copy of the instant payment order”) against D, the Defendant seized the goods listed in the attached list on July 9, 2018.

However, the articles listed in the attached list were owned by the plaintiff since the above date and time.

Therefore, it is necessary to deny compulsory execution against D based on the original copy of the instant payment order against D by the Defendant on the attached list.

The plaintiff's claim is justified, and provisional disposition suspending the compulsory execution is taken until this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[Inasmuch as the Defendant received notification of the date by public notice pursuant to Articles 194 through 196 of the Civil Procedure Act and did not appear on the date of pleading, only the matters necessary to specify the claim pursuant to Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be written in the reasoning of the judgment]