logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.07.03 2015가단5157
부동산 인도 등
Text

1. The Defendants are to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).

(a) Indication 1, 2, 5 of the attached list among the first floor of the building indicated in the attached list;

Reasons

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the statements and arguments in Gap 1-5, 6-1, and 6-2, the plaintiff (appointed party Eul and the appointed party Eul (hereinafter referred to as "the plaintiff") entered into a lease agreement with Eul and Eul (hereinafter referred to as "the plaintiff") on February 19, 190, and completed registration of preservation of ownership with respect to the facilities and houses living in Songpa-gu reinforced concrete building and mentmenves 5 stories, Songpa-gu, Seoul on June 30, 2012, the plaintiffs entered into the lease agreement with the defendant Eul on June 1, 201, after deducting the plaintiffs from the defendant Eul the indication of drawings (1), (2), (5), and (1) part (A) of the above building (hereinafter referred to as "office of this case"), 30 million won, monthly rent (value-added tax), 190,000 won, and 200,0000,000 won of the lease deposit for the lease of this case from the defendant 2.

According to the above facts, since the above lease contract was lawfully terminated due to the default of rent, Defendant B is obligated to deliver the office of this case to the plaintiffs upon the plaintiffs' request that the defendant company exercise the right to claim the removal of disturbance based on ownership, and Defendant B is obligated to deliver the office of this case to the plaintiffs, Defendant B is the overdue rent until the end of January 2015, and Defendant Company is the above period.

arrow