Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

The lower court sentenced the Defendant to one year and six months of imprisonment.

The defendant asserts that the above-mentioned sentence is too unfasible, so the prosecutor is too unfased and unfair.

Judgment

In order to take money in the name of protection from the victims of sexual traffic business places, the defendant 2 co-offenders and assaulted with two co-offenders, and 4 weeks of injury (such as string off, string off, etc.) was committed by assaulting with the steel direction system, as soon as possible.

The motive and method of crime, etc. are bad and the degree of injury of the victim is heavy.

The Defendant denied the accomplice’s participation in the investigation stage, and found the accomplice as his name in the investigation pending before the Defendant was prosecuted as either I and H (the grounds for appeal by the prosecutor, the reasons for appeal by the public prosecutor, and the records of the public trial 103 pages). The Defendant, who denied the use of dangerous goods, such as dynasing, and the participation of the accomplice, was in violation of all the confessions during the first instance trial (36 pages of the public trial record).

The injured person forced the Defendant to reach an agreement at the lower court (the trial record 89-90 pages). Meanwhile, the Defendant deposited KRW 3 million in 2005 due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act or an injury, a fine of KRW 1 million in 2006, a fine of KRW 2 million in 2009, a fine of KRW 3 million in 2012, a fine of KRW 2 million in 2000, a fine of KRW 2 million in 2000, a fine of KRW 2 million in 2000, a fine of KRW 3 million in 200,000 in 200, and a fine of KRW 3 million in 200,000 in 20,000 in 20,000 in 200,000 in 200,000,000 won in the lower court’s judgment, and more than 3,000,000 won in 20.

In the above circumstances.