1. The Defendant’s compulsory execution against the Plaintiff in accordance with this Court Decision 2015Da5212 decided June 18, 2015 is denied.

2.

In full view of the purport of each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the defendant filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff and received a favorable judgment on June 18, 2015, and the defendant filed an application for compulsory execution of real estate based on the executory exemplification of the above judgment as the plaintiff did not repay his/her obligation under the above judgment, and the plaintiff filed an application for compulsory execution of real estate on August 12, 2016. Accordingly, it is recognized that on August 12, 2016, the plaintiff deposited the repayment of KRW 2,910,910 (No. 6717 of the above court), which is the sum of the above debt and the expenses for compulsory execution (No. 6717 of the above court). Accordingly, the compulsory execution of the plaintiff's obligation against the defendant based on the above judgment has ceased

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and it is decided as per Disposition by taking into account the fact that the plaintiff was extinguished by paying the above claim after the defendant's application for compulsory auction.