beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving CK5 cars.
On December 6, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 07:30 on December 6, 2017, and continued to turn to the left at the right-hand side of the crossing-gun of Gangwon-do, the 3048-ro Gyeong-do and the Do-do-do-do-do-do-do-ro.
At this point, the previous eye was slicked and the center line was installed in the yellow-line, so the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to thoroughly operate the front-way in the vehicle driver and to safely operate the vehicle.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and took part of the left-hand part of the victim D (41) driving E dump truck, which was driven by a fump truck in the middle line, as part of the front part of the said K5 car, and continued as it is, the electric displays owned by the victim KT and the management agency of the victim’s original land territory were the front part of the said K5 car.
Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, destroyed the victim F (28) of the said K5 car to inflict injury on the victim D such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and damaged the victim F (34,714,300 won of the repair cost of the said dump truck at the same time, with approximately 34,714,30 won of the repair cost, respectively, to ensure that the above dump truck was in excess of KRW 636,118 of the repair cost of the said dump truck, respectively.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning traffic accident reports (1), (2), funeral photographs, each written diagnosis, each written estimate, and the KT telegraph design;
1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts;
1. The reasons for the sentencing of Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Code are that the defendant has a depth of his mistake.