beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
After the 2017 Highest 1459 case was prosecuted against A, the 2017 Highest 2655 case, which is the accomplice, and the 201 Highest 2017 Highest 2655 case, which is the charge of the Defendant A’s additional crimes, was charged.
In 2017 High Order 2655, the part on which Defendant A was additionally prosecuted was included in the facts charged on December 7, 2017, which was first 1459, and the amendment of indictment was made. The above two cases were the same as the facts charged that the Defendants conspired, and thus, were arranged as one of the facts charged.
[criminal record] Defendant A was sentenced to six years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Regulation of Similar Receiving Acts at the Seoul Central District Court on July 29, 2008, and completed the execution of the sentence in the former District Court on September 27, 2013.
Defendant
B On July 14, 2017, the Incheon District Court was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Regulation of Similar Receiving Acts, etc. at the Incheon District Court, and on July 22, 2017, the said judgment became final and conclusive.
[2] On September 10, 2015, when D, the Chairperson of C, a similar receiving company, operated C from around September 10, 2015 to March 29, 2016, Defendant A, the vice president of the above C, was controlled by similar receiving act and detained as D, the name of the above C was changed to E (Seoul F Building G) around April 1, 2016, and around June 16, 2016, Defendant A, the vice president of the above C, changed the name of the above E to the name of H Co., Ltd. (Seoul, Gangnam-gu I building and Jhoho) and then, around June 27, 2016, the name of the above H was changed to the name of the above K Co., Ltd. (Seoul, Seoul, and Seoul, building No. 1 and building No. 14455, May 27, 2016, Defendant A et al., who received the above authorization from the external investment authority, and continued to operate the above K Co.
Accordingly, around August 9, 2016, the Defendants made an investment in the victim M in the H office of the said H company.