The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The judgment below

Between 17 and 18 of the 5th page, “1. Commercial concurrences: the Criminal Code.

The gist of the defendant's appeal is that the punishment imposed by the court below (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, but considering the various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing in this case, the above argument is not reasonable since the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable since it is not acknowledged that the punishment imposed by the defendant is too unreasonable. [The "amount repaid" in the second half of the court below's judgment is deemed to be a clerical error of "the due date", and the court below erred in finding the defendant's criminal facts in this part of the second half of the 2018 Highest 601 among the summary of the evidence and without undergoing an examination of evidence, but the remaining evidence except this is sufficient to recognize this part of the criminal facts against the defendant. Thus, the above error of the court below did not affect the judgment because it dismissed the defendant's appeal pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is clear that the defendant's additional statement "in accordance with Article 50 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure" was omitted by Article 17 and Article 50 (2 of the Criminal Procedure Act.