Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the defendant shall be revoked.

The plaintiff's claim against the defendant is dismissed.

The plaintiff.

1. Scope of trial of this court after remand;

A. As to the real estate stated in the attached list, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant, against the Co-Defendant B of the first instance trial, seeking to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership on the ground of the completion of a provisional promise for sale based on the provisional registration, and seeking to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership on the ground of sale against the Defendant, and the court of first instance rendered a judgment citing the Plaintiff’s claim in full.

B. On the judgment of the court of first instance, only the defendant appealed and filed an appeal, and this court rendered a judgment dismissing the above appeal by the defendant (the co-defendant B did not appeal the judgment of the court of first instance against the judgment of the court of first instance, and the above judgment was separated and finalized as it is).

In this regard, the defendant's appeal was dismissed, and the Supreme Court reversed all the judgment of this court before the defendant's appeal was dismissed and sentenced to a judgment that is remanded to this court.

(d)

Therefore, the part of the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant B, which was separated and confirmed in the instant case, was excluded from the scope of the judgment of the court prior to the remand. The part of the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant is subject to the judgment of the court after the remand. Therefore, only that part shall be determined.

2. On February 10, 2013, the reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part is as follows: “The Defendant, on February 10, 2013, drafted a sales agreement with the Plaintiff’s wife E on March 10, 2013, selling the instant real estate at KRW 120 million, and the time of delivery.”

“The part of the judgment of the court of first instance is added, and except for the addition of “The evidence No. 1” to “The evidence of the judgment of the court of first instance No. 2,” as it is identical to the statement No. 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and it is cited as it is, as it is, including abbreviations pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (Provided, That the part against Co., Ltd. of the court of first instance, which is separate and finalized, is excluded). The plaintiff’s assertion on March 3.